April 25, 2013

FCA case on Trinity Global Support Foundation - CRA wins again

In this case Trinity Global Support Foundation (the “Foundation”) asked the court to delay CRA publishing a notice of intention to revoke the registered charity status until the Foundation’s other legal claims have been dealt with.  The FCA ruled against the Foundation because the Court determined that “there is no substantive evidence that the Foundation or its clients will be forced to shut down or be significantly affected prior to its notice of objection being considered.”  The Court also did not think that losing its charitable status caused irreparable harm as “It is clear from the evidence that the reputation of the Foundation has already been subject to intense public scrutiny for reasons distinct from the notice of intention to revoke.  As such, I see no basis upon which to conclude that any possible further harm to the Foundation’s reputation will be such as to amount to irreparable harm.” The judge does not mention the London Free Press coverage but presumably that is what is being referred to.  The conclusion of the FCA decision is important “Given my conclusions with respect to irreparable harm, I need not consider the balance of convenience element of the test.  However, it is clear that serious allegations have been raised in the context of the proposed revocation.  It is clear from the Foundation’s own evidence that it has been engaged in fundraising activities using tax shelter arrangements, which have been an activity of legitimate concern generally to the Minister.  As such, in my view the public interest in the Minister protecting the integrity of the charitable sector outweighs the Foundation’s interest in staying revocation and I see no reason for the Court to grant an equitable remedy to the Foundation.”

READ MORE »

April 24, 2013

CRA letter on Clergy Residence Deduction

CRA released a letter that discussed the issue of whether a member of the clergy who performs occasional liturgical services would satisfy the “function test” of ministering to a congregation, diocese or parish on a part-time or assistant basis. The CRA said no and stated that, “Where ministering duties performed by a member of the clergy are incidental to and not an integral part of his or her overall job responsibilities, it is our view that the function test would not be satisfied and that he or she would not be eligible to claim the clergy residence deduction provided for in paragraph 8(1)(c) of the Act.”

READ MORE »

CRA releases updated Guide on GST-HST information for Non-Profit Organizations

Last month CRA released an updated Guide which explains how the goods and services tax/harmonized sales tax (GST/HST) applies to non-profit organizations. This includes registration requirements, exemptions, rebates, and simplified methods of accounting that may apply to a non-profit organization.

READ MORE »

CRA releases updated Guide on GST-HST information for Charities

Last month the CRA released an updated Guide which explains how the goods and services tax/harmonized sales tax (GST/HST) applies to registered charities or registered Canadian amateur athletic associations.

READ MORE »

April 22, 2013

Finance releases Notice of Ways and Means Motion to amend the ITA to implement 2013 budget changes

Today the Department of Finance released the “Notice of Ways and Means Motion to amend the Income Tax Act, the Excise Tax Act and Related legislation”.  This will introduce the First-Time Donor Credit, improve the efficiency of the Tax Court of Canada which has been bogged down with charity gifting cases and allowing CRA with abusive gifting tax shelters to collect 1/2 of the taxes allegedly owed. 

READ MORE »

April 18, 2013

Ontario publishes Ontario Not-for-Profit Corporations Act (ONCA) Draft Organizational By-law

Posted by Mark Blumberg on 04/18 | comments (0) | permalink | forward to a friend
Published under: Canadian Charity Law | New corporate non-profit acts

The Ontario government has published an ONCA draft organizational by-law.

READ MORE »

April 08, 2013

Blumbergs’ Charity Law Boot Camp in Toronto - April 18, 2013

On April 18, 2013 we will have the first Blumbergs’ Charity Law Boot Camp in Toronto.  It will be a one day boot camp on compliance and standards issues for Canadian charities led by charity lawyer Mark Blumberg.

READ MORE »

April 03, 2013

CRA information on “Taxes in Dispute and Charitable Donation Tax Shelters”

The CRA has provided more information on the provision in the 2013 Federal Budget dealing with taxes in dispute and abusive charity gifting tax shelters. 

READ MORE »

CRA publishes additional information on “First-Time Donor’s Super Credit”

In the 2013 Federal Budget there was a small tax incentive for first time charitable donors called the “First-Time Donor’s Super Credit”.  CRA has provided additional information on the administration of this small tax incentive for giving.

READ MORE »

April 01, 2013

Globe and Mail article “New Canada Revenue rules target charitable tax shelters” by Paul Waldie

I wish it was an April Fool’s joke but unfortunately there are still Canadians investing in the ‘abusive charity gifting tax schemes’.  The Globe and Mail had an article today by Paul Waldie discussing “New Canada Revenue rules target charitable tax shelters”.  The article discusses a measure in the 2013 Federal Budget dealing with donation tax shelters.  Over the last decade over $6 billion in receipts have been issued as part of abusive charity gifting tax schemes.  As a result billions of dollars have either not been collected or have been delayed in collection.  The CRA has been winning these cases (for example Marechaux) and now the CRA will be given an increased ability to collect funds on disputed amounts related to donation tax shelters.  In the past CRA could not collect until the process was completed (sometimes 10 or more years later).  Now CRA can collect on 50% of potential taxes if CRA disputes the charity donation tax shelter.  If the taxpayer wins they would get their 50% back.  This just makes these schemes a little less attractive. It also reduces the likelihood of someone trying to avoid a large amount of taxes and then skipping off to Bermuda or Panama or wherever people skip off to these days. 

READ MORE »